Data centers

A new geography of displacement

Hyperscale data-center construction is the next wave of displacement in the United States. The atlas covers it with the same archival method the historical cases use: named blocks, named families where the record permits, named organizing groups, and a map that shows what the fence line alone cannot.

Eight regions, four version-four anchors

The eight regions where hyperscale data-center construction is reshaping land, water, and power in the United States. Pins mark the four version-four anchor campuses, each linked from the list below.

The map shows Eight US regions the atlas's data-center section covers and Version four anchor campuses.

  • Eight US regions the atlas's data-center section covers
  • Version four anchor campuses
Sources: Approximate regional boundaries drawn by the atlas to group grid-interconnect and utility siting patterns. Not a cartographic authority.; Coordinates approximate. See individual campus pages for parcel-accurate footprints..

Approximate regional boundaries drawn by the atlas to group grid-interconnect and utility siting patterns. Not a cartographic authority.; Coordinates approximate. See individual campus pages for parcel-accurate footprints..

The regional polygons group grid-interconnect and utility siting patterns, not state lines. Every campus page carries four map layers: the facility footprint, the adjacent residential area, the electric utility service territory, and the water source (aquifer or surface-water reach).

Version four anchor places

Four places open the data-center section. Each carries a long essay, a four-layer map, and the full bibliography.

The eight regions

  • Mid-Atlantic

    Version four

    Data Center Alley; Dominion rate pass-through.

  • Southeast

    Version four

    TVA and Southern Company territory; xAI in Memphis.

  • Texas

    Version five

    ERCOT; Stargate Abilene; Permian flare-gas.

  • Great Plains

    Version four

    Meta and Google in Sarpy County; LB 1261 carve-out.

  • Midwest

    Version four

    Licking County cluster; AEP Ohio and the PUCO tariff order.

  • Southwest

    Version five

    Phoenix West Valley under the ADWR moratorium.

  • Mountain West

    Version five

    Cedar Valley Utah; High Plains Wyoming.

  • Pacific Northwest

    Version five

    Prineville and The Dalles; Morrow County nitrate settlement.

See /roadmap/data-centers for the full candidate list and the research briefs behind it.

Method

The historical atlas treats each displacement as a specific act against specific people on a specific block in a specific year. The data-center section holds to that standard. Each essay names the operator, the acreage, the megawatts, the gallons, the utility, the ratepayer base that carries the grid upgrade, the aquifer or surface reach that carries the water, the displaced neighborhood, and the organizing coalition that is fighting. Historical cases in the atlas are linked at the end of each essay so that present organizers can borrow the tools the earlier fights built.